Home Blog Page 5

Stop sharing photos of your children on social media

By
Alan
-
Sharing photos of your children on social media

Sharing photos of your children on social media — often called “sharenting” — feels totally natural in our digitally connected world.

If anyone knows how tempting it is to share our kids’ hysterical, adorable, or unreal moments with our entire social networks, it’s us, the parents.

Sharing photos is a way to celebrate milestones, seek advice, or connect with distant family. But experts and parents increasingly warn that these innocent posts can create lasting risks, from privacy breaches to exploitation. By the time a child turns 13, parents may have shared around 1,300 photos or videos of them online.

Once posted, these images are hard to fully erase due to screenshots, shares, and platform algorithms. Below, I’ll outline specific types of photos (and details) to avoid, backed by common concerns from child safety advocates, cybersecurity pros, and real parent experiences.

Types of Photos and Details to Avoid Posting

Here’s a breakdown of problematic shares, why they’re risky, and safer alternatives. This isn’t about shaming — it’s about empowering you to protect your kids’ digital footprint.

With regard to location or other revealing shots try to avoid grabbing photos of your kids in front of your house (address visible), at school gates, or playgrounds with identifiable landmarks. Sharing photos taken in front of your home or school can establish potential routines, enabling stalking or harassment. Predators can piece together patterns from multiple posts. You can always crop out backgrounds and even use private family albums (e.g., iCloud shared folders) for close relatives only.

Birthdays and various other milestones can expose birth dates, ages, and locations, fueling identity theft — kids’ clean credit histories make them prime targets for fraudulent accounts. Try to avoid the public images of party photos with the cake showing age, or “1st birthday at [venue]” captions. Try to share the milestone verbally or via encrypted messages; avoid public dates/names.

Full-face close-ups can feed facial recognition tech and AI tools that generate deepfakes or explicit content (even from clothed images). Platforms own rights to redistribute your uploads like smiling portraits, sleeping babies, or family selfies showing clear faces for example. Try using emojis/stickers over faces, back/silhouette views, or no-face shots (e.g., feet in sand).

School or uniform shared photos can identify education details, making bullying or targeted approaches easier. Uniforms can tag routines like bus stops. Avoid grabbing shots of your kids in school clothes, backpack, or with classmates surrounded by identifiable settings. You should wait for consent (around age 6-8) and post their photos only if they agree; otherwise, skip.

Embarrassing or vulnerable moments can violate future consent — kids may cringe at tantrums, potty training, or messes immortalized online. These can lead to “digital kidnapping” where images are stolen and repurposed as someone else’s child. These would be things like bath time, meltdowns, or “adorable fails” like food-smeared faces for instance. Keep private journals or printed albums; discuss boundaries with your kids as they grow.

Be cautious of group photos with unvetted people. These can expose your kid alongside others without permission; others might re-post publicly. Situations like this often involve family events where faces aren’t blurred, or playdates with non-close friends’ kids. You might do well to ask permission from all of the parents; blur non-family faces or share one-on-one.

These risks of sharing photos aren’t hypothetical: Australian officials once uncovered 45 million child images (mostly from social media) in predator caches with many innocent play shots. AI now amplifies threats, turning family dinners into source material for harmful edits.

Broader Risks of Sharenting

    • Predator Access: Even private accounts aren’t foolproof — followers can screenshot and share. Cybersecurity experts note metadata (like GPS tags) embeds location data automatically.
    • Identity Theft & Long-Term Harm: Oversharing builds profiles for fraud; one expert advises a “holiday card-or-less” rule — minimal, non-identifying updates.
    • Consent & Emotional Impact: Kids can’t opt out young, leading to anxiety over “cringy” teen discoveries. Many parents regret it and delete archives.
    • Platform Exploitation: Social media terms grant companies rights to your content forever, potentially for ads or training AI.
Tips for Safer Sharing

If you still want to share (totally valid!), prioritize privacy:

    • Go Private/Minimalist: Limit to close circles; use invite-only apps like Tinybeans for family-only access.
    • Tech Tweaks: Disable location services, facial recognition, and auto-uploads. Set Google Alerts for your kid’s name.
    • Family Buy-In: Announce boundaries at birth (e.g., “No shares, please—we’re keeping it offline”) and remind gently. Cover faces in group shots.
    • Involve Your Kids: Start consent talks early; let them curate as teens.
    • Offline Joy: Print photos for albums or host in-person shares — validation from likes isn’t worth the vulnerability.

Ultimately, it’s your call, but erring on the side of caution gives kids agency over their story. As one parent put it: “She didn’t choose social media — I did.” If you’re rethinking past posts, tools like Instagram’s “Download Your Data” can help you to audit and delete.

I’m pretty sure that in the future, your kids will thank you for the protected space to grow up offline.




 

The recent buzz around UAP (UFO) Sightings

By
Aimee
-
UAP (UFO) Sightings

Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP), the modern term for what used to be called UFOs, have been making headlines again this year.

Any of the buzz I might be referring to centers on a high-profile congressional hearing that was held last week on September 9, where witnesses testified about mysterious sightings, government secrecy, and national security risks. The event has sort of reignited public debate, media coverage, and online discussions about whether these phenomena are extraterrestrial, advanced foreign tech, or something more mundane like drones or balloons.

Here’s what went on last week:

The September 9, 2025, Congressional Hearing

The U.S. House Oversight Committee’s Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets, chaired by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Florida), hosted its third UAP hearing since 2023. Titled “Restoring Public Trust Through UAP Transparency and Whistleblower Protection,” it featured four witnesses under oath: three military veterans and one journalist. The goal was to push for more government transparency on UAP reports, especially those from military personnel, and to address allegations of reprisals against whistleblowers.

Key Testimonies and Sightings Highlighted

Dylan Borland a U.S. Air Force Veteran described a 2012 sighting at Langley Air Force Base in Virginia of a massive, silent, 100-foot triangular craft hovering over the base. He claimed he was interviewed by the Pentagon’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) in 2023, but his report was dismissed. Borland alleged “sustained reprisals” for speaking out, including career threats.

Jeffrey Nuccetelli, a U.S. Air Force Veteran, shared encounters with a UAP during his service, emphasizing the need for better whistleblower protections.

Alexandro Wiggins a U.S. Navy Senior Chief Petty Officer, recounted a 2003 sighting where a UAP approached his ship, with crew members screaming, “It’s coming right for us!” He was the first active-duty witness to come forward publicly.

George Knapp, an Investigative Journalist, highlighted a “bank of UAP videos” held by the government that Congress hasn’t seen. He criticized AARO for using science to downplay sightings without full disclosure.

The hearing underscored frustrations with the Pentagon’s handling of UAP. Witnesses accused AARO of spreading misinformation and lacking transparency, despite its mandate to investigate sightings. Rep. Luna stated that “American people deserve maximum transparency … on whether [UAPs] pose a potential threat to Americans’ safety.” Democratic Rep. Jasmine Crockett (D-Texas) noted that while some sightings might be adversarial tech, military personnel deserve protection for reporting them. This wasn’t just talk — lawmakers like Rep. Eric Burlison (R-Missouri) presented dramatic evidence, fueling calls for declassification and reform.

The Bombshell Video

Missile vs. Mysterious Orb

A major highlight was a never-before-seen video released by Rep. Burlison, showing a U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drone allegedly firing a Hellfire missile at a fast-moving, shiny orb-shaped UAP off the coast of Yemen on October 30, 2024. The footage, provided by a whistleblower and slowed down for clarity, depicts the missile striking the orb but “bouncing right off,” with the object continuing unimpeded.

The orb was tracked moving rapidly, and after the impact, it “kept going.” Knapp commented during the hearing: “That’s a hellfire missile smacking into that UFO, and bouncing right off.” This incident revived scrutiny of UAP resilience and potential threats.

See the video:
video
play-sharp-fill

The incident also raised questions about national security — could these be advanced drones from adversaries like China or Russia? Or something more exotic? The video has gone viral, with outlets like ABC News, Newsweek, and BBC covering it extensively. Critics, including some in the UAP community, have debated its authenticity, with skeptics suggesting it could be a balloon or optical illusion, but proponents argue it shows technology beyond known human capabilities.

This footage has amplified the UAP noise as it directly challenges AARO’s claims of no verifiable extraterrestrial evidence and highlights perceived government stonewalling.

Surge in UAP Sightings

UAP reports have spiked in 2025, with the National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC) logging over 3,000 in the first half of the year alone — up from 2,077 in the same period of 2023 and 1,492 in 2024. An independent report from May 2023 to June 2024 documented 757 new sightings, mostly “lights” in the sky, often near military sites. Common explanations include balloons (70% of closed cases), drones (16%), birds (8%), and satellites (4%), but stigma around reporting persists.

Other Recent Sightings

In Finger Lakes, New York (August 2025), a glowing orb sparked UFO mania in a small town, going viral on social media before being identified as a Vulcan Centaur rocket launch from Florida.

During the New Jersey Drone Swarms (Ongoing into 2025), citizen scientists John and Gerry Tedesco, using custom hyperspectral cameras and radar, investigated mysterious drones with “signature management” tech (changing light frequencies to evade detection). Their work, acknowledged by former AARO director Tim Phillips, warns of airspace anomalies that could “come home to roost.”

With regard to the historical Peruvian Jungle Incident, marine Jonathan Weygandt described stumbling upon a “living” UFO craft in the jungle, followed by U.S. officials detaining him and ordering silence — dismissed as a “weather balloon.”

Even more recently at Wright-Patterson AFB, there were sightings of a huge black cube UAP over five days, plus triangular crafts, with pilot Ryan Graves’ group set to release 900+ new close-encounter reports.

The Pentagon’s AARO maintains a “rigorous scientific framework” and finds no evidence of extraterrestrial origins, attributing most to prosaic causes. NASA echoes this, stating no credible alien evidence exists. However, nearly half of Americans believe the government is concealing info, per polls. Whistleblowers like Luis Elizondo (former Pentagon UAP program head) have accused the intelligence community of “excessive secrecy” to hide non-human presence.

Public Reaction and Broader Implications

Coverage from BBC, USA Today, Space.com, and Newsweek has exploded, with X (formerly Twitter) buzzing about the hearing — posts debating the Yemen video, whistleblower reprisals, and calls for disclosure garnered thousands of engagements. Semantic searches show frustration with government “normalizing” anomalies without deeper investigation.

Proponents argue UAP pose real threats (e.g., interfering with aircraft), while skeptics like Mick West point to misidentifications. Aerospace experts warn of complacency, as unaddressed anomalies could lead to incidents.

A push for change? Maybe. Bipartisan lawmakers are renewing UAP disclosure legislation. Groups like Americans for Safe Aerospace are amplifying pilot reports, and events like the UAP Disclosure Fund’s briefings add pressure.

With over 2,000 sightings reported in early 2025, the stigma is fading, but controversies (e.g., debates over “transients” in astronomical plates possibly linked to nuclear tests or UAP) keep the topic heated.

At the end of the day, all of this most recent buzz about UAP stems from credible military testimonies, undeniable video evidence of resilient UAP, and ongoing secrecy allegations amid rising sightings. While the government insists most are explainable, the hearing has substantiated claims of underreporting and reprisals, fueling demands for transparency. If these are just drones or balloons, why the resistance to full disclosure? The debate rages on, blending science, security, and speculation.

For more info on all of this business about UAP, you can check out the ongoing coverage from sources like NewsNation or NUFORC.




 

The life and death of Charlie Kirk

By
Alan
-
Charlie Kirk

Charlie Kirk (Charles James Kirk) was born on October 14, 1993 in Arlington Heights, Illinois. He was a producer and writer, known for Identity Crisis (2025), Border Battle (2022) and Race War.

Early Life and Education

He grew up in nearby Prospect Heights in a middle-class family. His father was an architect specializing in luxury estates, while his mother worked as a trader at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange before transitioning to mental health counseling.

Kirk attended Wheeling High School, where classmates later described him as “rude,” “arrogant,” and possessing a “superiority complex,” though he was politically active from a young age, inspired by conservative figures like Ronald Reagan. A self-described “Reagan-loving schoolboy,” Kirk skipped college after one semester at Harper College, opting instead to pursue activism full-time.

Rise in Conservative Activism

Kirk’s political career ignited in high school when, at age 18, he co-founded Turning Point USA (TPUSA) in 2012 with Bill Montgomery. The nonprofit aimed to mobilize young conservatives on college campuses, promoting free-market principles and countering what Kirk called “leftist indoctrination.” Under his leadership as executive director and CEO, TPUSA grew rapidly, establishing over 3,000 chapters by 2025 and raising millions in funding from donors like the Koch brothers and Foster Friess. Kirk’s “Professor Watchlist,” launched in 2016, targeted academics accused of liberal bias, drawing both praise from the right and criticism for stifling free speech.

He became a key ally of Donald Trump during the 2016 election, organizing voter turnout among young Republicans and befriending Donald Trump Jr. Kirk spoke at the Republican National Convention that year and played a role in Trump’s 2020 campaign through TPUSA’s Turning Point Action arm, a dark-money group that funneled resources to pro-Trump efforts. His influence extended to events like the January 6, 2021, Capitol rally, where TPUSA was accused (though denied) of funding bus travel for attendees. Critics, including some conservatives, labeled Kirk an “anti-Semite” due to associations with figures like Milo Yiannopoulos and events that attracted alt-right crowds post-Charlottesville.

Media Career and Influence

By his mid-20s, Charlie Kirk had become a media powerhouse. In October 2020, he launched The Charlie Kirk Show, a daily three-hour radio program syndicated on Salem Media Group’s “The Answer” network. The podcast surged in popularity, reaching 500,000–750,000 daily downloads in 2024 and ranking as the 21st-most popular on Apple Podcasts by late 2021. His “Turning Point Live” streaming show targeted Generation Z, amassing 111,000 monthly unique visitors by 2021.

Kirk authored several books, including Time for a Turning Point (2016) and The MAGA Doctrine (2023), blending conservative policy critiques with calls for Christian nationalism. He produced documentaries like Identity Crisis (2025) and Border Battle (2022), focusing on election integrity and immigration. By 2025, Kirk was a millionaire, with TPUSA’s annual revenue exceeding $100 million, and he was seen as Trump’s “ambassador to youthful conservatives.” His campus tours, like the “American Comeback Tour,” often sparked protests but amplified his reach.

Personal Life

Kirk married Erika Frantzve, a former Miss Arizona USA and collegiate basketball player pursuing a doctorate in Biblical studies at Liberty University, in 2021. The couple had two young children: a son (born May 2024) and a daughter (born August 2022). Erika often appeared alongside Kirk at events, and they shared glimpses of family life on social media, emphasizing faith and patriotism. Kirk was a devout Christian, frequently invoking the Gospel in his rhetoric.

Assassination and Immediate Aftermath

On September 10, 2025, at age 31, Kirk was fatally shot during a TPUSA speaking event at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, as part of his “American Comeback Tour.” The assailant, 22-year-old Tyler Robinson — a Utah resident with no prior public political ties — fired a long rifle round from atop a nearby building, striking Kirk in the chest and neck. Kirk was pronounced dead at the scene despite immediate medical intervention. Robinson fled but surrendered peacefully two days later on September 12, after confessing in text messages to a roommate and expressing fear of police retaliation. DNA evidence and planning texts linked him to the crime; prosecutors charged him with capital murder, citing aggravating factors like endangering bystanders, and announced plans to seek the death penalty — Utah’s first potential execution in over 15 years.

The FBI offered a $100,000 reward during the manhunt and released images of Robinson as a person of interest. President Trump, a close ally, mourned Kirk on Truth Social as “the Great, and even Legendary” voice of American youth, announcing a posthumous Presidential Medal of Freedom and plans to attend his Arizona funeral. Vigils sprang up nationwide, from Utah campuses to Illinois parks, with American flags and candles honoring Kirk.

Broader Impact and Legacy

Charlie Kirk’s assassination on September 10, 2025, cemented his status as a polarizing figure in American politics, amplifying both his influence and the controversies surrounding him. For supporters, Kirk was a martyr for conservative values, galvanizing a new generation of activists. Turning Point USA saw a surge in engagement, with 37,000 new chapter requests, his books topping Amazon charts, and The Charlie Kirk Show podcast hitting number one on Apple Podcasts. Conservative leaders, including Donald Trump, hailed him as a patriotic voice for youth, awarding him a posthumous Presidential Medal of Freedom. Vigils and tributes across the U.S., from Utah to Illinois, underscored his role in mobilizing young Republicans and promoting free-market principles and Christian values.

Critics, however, viewed Kirk’s legacy through a more critical lens, pointing to his divisive rhetoric and associations with controversial figures. Outlets like The Nation and The New Republic highlighted his ties to Christian nationalism, his role in events attracting alt-right elements, and statements critics labeled as inflammatory on issues like race, immigration, and LGBTQ+ rights. They argued his “Professor Watchlist” and campus confrontations stifled academic freedom, while his proximity to figures like Milo Yiannopoulos and events post-Charlottesville raised questions about enabling extremism. Some saw his death as a tragic consequence of the polarized climate he helped fuel, though they condemned the violence unequivocally.

Both sides acknowledged Kirk’s outsized impact. His ability to blend media savvy, grassroots organizing, and proximity to power — evident in his Trump alliance and TPUSA’s $100 million operation — reshaped conservative youth activism. Yet, his death also sparked broader debates about political discourse, free speech, and the risks of radicalization in a divided nation. Supporters launched initiatives like the “Charlie Kirk Data Foundation” to honor his mission, while critics called for reflection on the consequences of inflammatory rhetoric. Kirk’s life and death thus left a dual legacy: a rallying cry for the right and a cautionary tale for those seeking to bridge America’s deepening divides.




 

Tasty Bacon Cheeseburger Meatloaf

By
Alan
-
Bacon Cheeseburger Meatloaf

This bacon cheeseburger meatloaf combines the juicy, savory flavors of a classic cheeseburger with the comforting, hearty texture of meatloaf. It’s packed with ground beef, crispy bacon, melty cheese, and burger-inspired seasonings, making it a crowd-pleasing dinner option.

Ingredients:

For the Meatloaf:
    • 1 ½ lbs (680g) ground beef (80/20 for best flavor)
    • ½ lb (225g) bacon, cooked and crumbled (about 6-8 slices)
    • 1 cup shredded cheddar cheese (or a cheddar blend)
    • ¾ cup breadcrumbs (panko or regular)
    • ½ cup finely chopped onion (or grated for smoother texture)
    • ¼ cup finely chopped dill pickles (optional, for that burger vibe)
    • 2 large eggs, lightly beaten
    • ¼ cup ketchup
    • 2 tbsp yellow mustard
    • 1 tbsp Worcestershire sauce
    • 1 tsp garlic powder
    • 1 tsp onion powder
    • ½ tsp smoked paprika (optional, for a smoky flavor)
    • ½ tsp salt
    • ½ tsp black pepper
For the Topping:
    • ½ cup ketchup
    • 2 tbsp brown sugar
    • 1 tbsp yellow mustard
    • 4-6 slices bacon, partially cooked (still pliable, for topping)
    • ½ cup shredded cheddar cheese (for final topping)

Directions:

    • Preheat your oven to 375°F.
    • Line a baking sheet with parchment paper or lightly grease a loaf pan.
    • Cook the ½ lb bacon until crispy, then crumble and set aside.
    • Reserve 4-6 additional bacon slices for topping (cook these partially, about 2-3 minutes, so they’re still flexible).
    • In a large bowl, combine ground beef, crumbled bacon, 1 cup shredded cheddar, breadcrumbs, onion, pickles (if using), eggs, ketchup, mustard, Worcestershire sauce, garlic powder, onion powder, smoked paprika, salt, and pepper.
    • Mix gently with your hands or a spoon until just combined — don’t overmix to avoid a dense texture.
    • If using a loaf pan, press the mixture evenly into a 9×5-inch pan.
    • For a free-form loaf, shape the mixture into a loaf shape (about 8×4 inches) on the prepared baking sheet.
    • In a small bowl, mix ketchup, brown sugar, and mustard for the glaze.
    • Spread half of the glaze over the meatloaf.
    • Lay the partially cooked bacon slices over the top, tucking ends under if needed.
    • Bake for 50-60 minutes, or until the internal temperature reaches 160°F.
    • About 10 minutes before it’s done, spread the remaining glaze over the bacon and sprinkle with the ½ cup shredded cheddar cheese.
    • Return to the oven to melt the cheese.
    • Let the meatloaf rest for 10 minutes before slicing to retain juices.
    • Serve with classic burger sides like mashed potatoes, fries, or a green salad.
    • Optional: top with extra ketchup, mustard, or even burger toppings like lettuce and tomato slices.
Tips:
    • Make it Burger-Like: Add a layer of sautéed mushrooms or caramelized onions inside the meatloaf for extra flavor.
    • Cheese Variations: Swap cheddar for American, Swiss, or pepper jack for a different twist.
    • Storage: Store leftovers in an airtight container in the fridge for up to 3 days. Reheat slices in the microwave or oven. Freezes well for up to 3 months.
    • Burger Bun Hack: Serve slices on toasted hamburger buns with mayo, lettuce, and tomato for a fun cheeseburger-inspired sandwich.

This Bacon Cheeseburger Meatloaf recipe is inspired by various sources combining cheeseburger and meatloaf elements, tailored for maximum flavor and ease.




 

The Galactic Federation Transmission

By
Alan
-
Galactic Federation

The Galactic Federation Transmission refers to a famous signal intrusion on November 26, 1977, where the audio of a Southern Television broadcast in southern England was interrupted for nearly six minutes by a distorted voice claiming to be “Vrillon,” a representative of the “Ashtar Galactic Command,” also sometimes called the Galactic Federation.

At about 5:10 p.m. local time, viewers heard their TV audio overpowered by a buzzing noise, then an altered voice delivering a message that warned of humanity’s impending fate and urged people to “abandon weapons” and strive for peace in order to avoid disaster and reach a “higher state of evolution.”

The purported speaker, Vrillon (or sometimes called Gillon, Asteron, or versions thereof in various reports), claimed to speak on behalf of the extraterrestrial Ashtar Galactic Command.

The video feed wasn’t affected, and the event caused a flurry of calls and panic among viewers. Southern Television apologized, and it was quickly determined that the broadcast had been hijacked by using a nearby unauthorized transmitter.

The core message warned that Earth was entering a “New Age of Aquarius” and needed to disarm to avoid catastrophe.

Viewers were told to “learn to live together in peace and goodwill” and to be on guard against “false prophets and guides” who would exploit them.

The speaker urged spiritual evolution and warned that only those who embrace peace would “pass to the higher realms of spiritual evolution.”

The incident became a legendary unsolved case of broadcast hijacking, referenced widely in ufology and popular culture.

Investigations attributed it to a technically savvy hoax using transmitter relaying vulnerabilities, but some, believe it or not, still speculate about its origin.

Full Transcript of the Transmission

Based on contemporary reports and audio analyses (e.g., from Fortean Times and archived recordings), here’s the complete message delivered by the voice. It urged humanity to abandon destructive technologies and prepare for spiritual evolution, themes common in Ashtar-related channelings:

“This is the voice of Vrillon, a representative of the Ashtar Galactic Command, speaking to you. For many years you have seen us as lights in the skies. We speak to you now in peace and wisdom as we have done to your forefathers. Do not ignore this message, but attend to it. All your weapons of evil must be removed. The time for conflict is now past and the race of which you are a part may proceed to the higher stages of its evolution if you show yourselves worthy by responding to this message from the cosmos. We have been watching you for many years. Your leaders have been warned. The time is now for all to listen. All who attempt to deny the truth will fail. All who attempt to deny the value of this message will be removed from the planet. The weapons of evil must be destroyed. The time for conflict is now past. We are leaving the planes of your existence. May you be blessed by the supreme love and truth of the cosmos.”

The transmission ended abruptly, and normal programming resumed with a Merrie Melodies cartoon (The Goofy Gophers).

This event, the Galactic Federation Transmission, is commonly called the “Southern Television broadcast interruption” and is noted as a significant unexplained broadcast mystery of the 20th century.

Media Reaction

Newspapers and news bulletins the following day described the event as a bizarre electronic intrusion and noted that hundreds of viewers called in, worried or curious about the incident.

Initial media reports cited differing names for the speaker (Vrillon, Gillon, or Asteron), reflecting the poor audio quality and public uncertainty. The message and its potential connection to UFO cults (like the Ashtar Command) were discussed in investigative reporting and radio features.

British and American newspapers published contradictory accounts, including differences regarding the name of the supposed alien and the exact wording of the message.

Some outlets and later retrospectives noted the coincidence of the anti-war message with the contemporary news segment about the Rhodesia conflict, reinforcing public intrigue and debate.

Contemporary news and official coverage reflected the confusion and technological novelty of the Galactic Federation Transmission event, which became a major topic in the media and remains a compelling unsolved broadcast mystery to this day.

I find it somewhat odd that this sort of thing would happen shortly after season 15 of Doctor Who had started in September.

Coincidence? Maybe … maybe not. You decide.




 

1...456...136Page 5 of 136
© 2006 - 2025 -- Cookiesandcowpies.com --- site by Reddwebdev