Teachers tell old stories — think fables, myths, folktales, classics, or even personal anecdotes from the past — because storytelling is one of the most effective, time-tested ways to teach. It’s literally the oldest form of education, used by humans for millennia to pass on knowledge, values, and culture before books or lectures existed.
Stories make lessons stick
Your brain is wired for narrative. Information wrapped in a story is far easier to remember and recall later. Research shows facts are about 20 times more likely to stick when embedded in a story compared to lists or lectures. Old stories turn abstract ideas (history, science, morals) into something vivid and memorable, so students actually retain what they learn instead of forgetting it after the test.
Old stories grab attention and boost engagement
Dry facts can bore students, but a well-told old story (like Aesop’s fables or Greek myths) hooks everyone instantly. Kids (and adults) naturally lean in — they visualize scenes, feel emotions, and get curious about what happens next. This raises enthusiasm, improves listening skills, and even motivates reluctant learners or English-language learners to participate more.
Teaching timeless lessons and building character
Old stories often carry universal morals about right and wrong, courage, kindness, or consequences (e.g., the tortoise and the hare, or ancient legends). They help kids develop empathy, understand different perspectives, and navigate real-life situations. Teachers use them to spark discussions on ethics, decision-making, and human nature—skills that go far beyond the textbook.
Old stories can connect students to culture, history, and each other
Old stories transmit cultural heritage, and can explain why things are the way they are, and help students appreciate diverse viewpoints. Reading or hearing myths from other cultures builds respect, empathy, and a sense of shared humanity. They also deepen emotional understanding by exposing kids to a wide range of experiences they might not encounter otherwise.
Old stories humanize the teacher and create community
When teachers share old stories from their own lives or retell classics with personal twists, it builds trust and rapport. The classroom feels more like a community where everyone is learning together, not just memorizing facts. It also sparks students’ own creativity — they start telling, writing, or acting out stories themselves.
In short, old stories aren’t just fun extras — they’re a superpower for teaching. They turn passive listening into active thinking, make complicated topics relatable, and help students remember lessons for life. That’s why teachers keep reaching for them, even in the age of videos and apps. Next time you hear one in class, you’ll know it’s not random — it’s deliberate teaching magic
The science behind old storytelling
The neuroscience of storytelling reveals why narratives are such a powerful tool for learning, connection, and memory — far more effective than dry facts alone. When we hear or tell a story, our brains don’t just process words; they simulate experiences, sync with others, release feel-good chemicals, and weave information into long-lasting memories. This is backed by fMRI studies, hormone research, and brain imaging that show storytelling lights up multiple regions simultaneously.
Pioneering work by neuroscientist Uri Hasson at Princeton (2010) used fMRI scans to show that when one person tells a story, the listener’s brain activity mirrors the storyteller’s in real time — often with a slight delay, and sometimes even anticipating what comes next. This speaker-listener neural coupling happens across language areas, sensory cortices, and higher-level networks like the default mode network (DMN). The stronger the sync, the better the listener understands and remembers the story.
It’s like the storyteller herds the audience’s brains onto the same wavelength. This doesn’t happen with random facts — only with coherent narratives.
Neurochemical Boost: Oxytocin and Dopamine
-
- Oxytocin (the “bonding” or “empathy” hormone): Emotionally compelling stories trigger its release, making us feel connected, trusting, and empathetic. Paul Zak’s research shows it promotes narrative transportation — you mentally step into the story as if it’s happening to you. This fosters prosocial behavior and helps stories change attitudes or inspire action.
- Dopamine (the “reward” chemical): Suspense, anticipation, and emotional peaks release dopamine, sharpening focus, motivation, and memory. That’s why cliffhangers or vivid twists make stories unforgettable — your brain treats the resolution like a reward, consolidating details with high accuracy.
Together, these chemicals explain why stories build empathy, trust, and retention better than lectures.
Mirror Neurons and Sensory-Motor Simulation
Stories activate mirror neurons — cells that fire both when you do something and when you observe (or hear about) it. In a narrative, your brain simulates the characters’ actions, emotions, and sensations as if you’re experiencing them: motor cortices light up for movement descriptions, sensory areas for sights/sounds, and emotional regions for feelings.
Your brain can’t always tell the difference between a well-told story and real life. This is why old fables or myths feel so immersive — they let you practice life scenarios safely.
Memory Formation: The Hippocampus and Default Mode Network
The hippocampus acts like a storyteller itself, weaving separate events into one cohesive narrative memory. Stories framed conceptually (emotions, meanings) engage the default mode network (DMN) — involved in self-reflection and mentalizing—while perceptual details (sights, sounds) tap sensory networks. This dual activation makes story-based memories more durable and easier to recall than isolated facts.
Evolutionarily, this makes sense: our ancestors used stories to predict the future, survive threats, and bond socially without trial-and-error.
In classrooms (tying back to those old stories), this neuroscience explains the magic: tales turn abstract lessons into simulated experiences your brain treats as real, boosting engagement, empathy, and retention.
No wonder humans have told stories for 30,000+ years — our brains are literally built for them.





No Kings: An Open Call For Communism
So I guess the No Kings Communists were out in full force Saturday calling for a revolution.
They all gathered up along the George Shanley Bridge here in town to demonstrate their great disdain for the American way of life — pushing for some sort of change from liberty to some quasi sort of authoritarianism.
When you look at the average age of these people you might begin to understand why they are going on about hating freedom so much — these are people from my generation, tired old white people who in their younger years embraced the utopian spew of Mao in the 60’s. These sorts of demonstrations serve only to attempt to mask the utopian ideologies that were prevalent in 1968 and today, as back then, serve absolutely no useful purpose — other than to demonstrate the societal ignorance that still persists.
The so-called No Kings movement has less to do with Trump than you might think — sure, Trump is a bombastic self centered egotist, but if you look closely enough you’ll see that Trump is just the latest placeholder for the movements angst. Next week at 2 o’clock it will be somebody else, and on and on it goes.
So-called caring and enlightened people being sold a bill of goods is nothing new in this country. No Kings is just the latest manifestation of a Communist movement that started way back in the 1920’s — Communism by any other name is still Communism. Call it what you will, the ideology is still the same. McCarthy was on to something back in the 1950’s I think.
Social Security (1935) is a program lifted directly from the Soviet playbook. LBJ’s Great Society (1964) was a further extension of the Communist agenda — the social security system in the Soviet Union was established after the October Revolution of 1917, focusing on providing social insurance, pensions, and various benefits to workers and their families. Over time, it evolved to include healthcare, housing, and support for vulnerable groups — sound familiar?
Though it might be claimed that No Kings is a grassroots movent it’s anything but — the movement is a well organized and heavily funded movement by design.
Follow the Money
No Kings is funded, in part, by a network of socialist and communist-aligned groups (e.g., Party for Socialism and Liberation, People’s Forum, CodePink, ANSWER Coalition, Freedom Road Socialist Organization) that actively participates and mobilizes members. Many of these are funded by Neville Roy Singham, a U.S. tech billionaire and self-described communist who has poured hundreds of millions into far-left activism (often with reported ties to China-linked causes).
Hundreds of other partners (for funding and organization) include the ACLU, Planned Parenthood Action Fund, MoveOn, Sierra Club, Human Rights Campaign, AFL-CIO and other unions, Democratic Socialists of America, League of Women Voters, Greenpeace, and many local Indivisible/50501 chapters. These groups are funded by a mix of:
Bottom line
No Kings is being financed by the normal operating budgets of a vast left-wing nonprofit/union network, with George Soros’ foundations as a major documented backer of the lead organizer (Indivisible) and Neville Roy Singham as a key financier of the more radical socialist factions involved.
No evidence of direct foreign government funding or a centralized “No Kings” war chest exists in public reporting.
Communism Deposes Kings
Communism really never stops at kings. It deposes the very idea of limited power, property, or dissent — and installs something that makes most historical monarchs look restrained by comparison.
History shows the pattern with brutal clarity.
Here are just a few examples:
Similar patterns hit Bulgaria, Hungary, and other Eastern European states after WWII under Soviet influence. Where no king existed (Cuba under Batista, China after the Qing had already fallen), the pattern was the same: traditional power structures were liquidated.
One thing that sort of struck me when I drove across the George Shanley Bridge on Saturday was that there were so many people railing against a system that they themselves are trying to usher in. It just boggles the mind at how so many people can be brainwashed into believing that Communism is a good thing. They hate Trump because they were told to hate Trump — the focus has to be on Trump because if it weren’t they might be appalled at what they are actually fighting for. The real kicker here is that they were all standing out there for free. Standing out there encouraging their own downfall.
I’m not going to ask anyone to make it make sense. Communism is nonsensical already and it makes people do nonsensical things — as we saw Saturday on the George Shanley Bridge.