Home Blog Page 18

The Future of Kitchen Lighting

The Future of Kitchen Lighting

The future of kitchen lighting is likely to focus on a blend of functionality, energy efficiency, and aesthetic appeal, driven by advancements in technology and design trends. Based on current developments and the trajectory of smart home innovations, here are the key directions:

Smart Lighting Integration:

Kitchen lighting will increasingly integrate with smart home systems. LED lights with IoT capabilities will allow users to control brightness, color temperature, and even lighting scenes via apps or voice assistants like Alexa or Google Home. For example, you might set a warm, dim light for a cozy dinner or a bright, cool light for food prep, all with a simple voice command. Some systems may even sync with circadian rhythms, adjusting light tones to promote alertness during the day and relaxation at night.

Energy Efficiency and Sustainability:

LED technology will continue to dominate due to its low energy consumption and long lifespan. Future kitchens might incorporate solar-powered lighting or energy-harvesting systems, like kinetic energy from opening cabinets, to power small lights. Additionally, manufacturers are likely to use more eco-friendly materials, such as recycled plastics or biodegradable components, in lighting fixtures.

Adaptive and Task-Oriented Lighting:

Lighting will become more task-specific, with under-cabinet lights, recessed lighting, and pendant lights designed to adapt to the user’s activities. Motion sensors and AI could automatically adjust lighting based on where you’re standing or what you’re doing—brighter lights over the stove when you’re cooking, softer ambient lighting when you’re dining. Some systems might use cameras or heat sensors to detect activity and optimize illumination accordingly.

Aesthetic and Customizable Designs:

Lighting will play a bigger role in kitchen aesthetics. Expect to see more sculptural fixtures, like minimalist LED strips or artistic pendants, that double as decor. Customizable lighting, where you can change colors or patterns, will also grow in popularity—imagine a backsplash with embedded LED panels that shift hues to match your mood or the season.

Hygienic and Health-Focused Features:

With a growing emphasis on hygiene, especially post-pandemic, UV-C lighting might be integrated into kitchens to sanitize surfaces when not in use. These lights would activate automatically during off-hours, killing bacteria on countertops or utensils without human intervention.

Augmented Reality (AR) and Interactive Lighting:

As AR technology advances, kitchen lighting could become interactive. For instance, lights might project recipes or cooking guides onto countertops, or highlight specific areas of the kitchen for meal prep. This could be paired with gesture controls, allowing you to swipe through instructions without touching a screen.

The overall trend points toward kitchens that are smarter, more sustainable, and highly personalized, with lighting that enhances both functionality and the overall experience. While some of these technologies, like UV-C or AR lighting, are still emerging, they’re likely to become more mainstream in the next 5-10 years as costs decrease and adoption grows.




 

The Montana Housing Miracle

The Montana Housing Miracle

The Montana Housing Miracle — The original term “Montana Miracle” refers to a series of housing reform laws passed here in Montana, primarily in 2023, aimed at addressing the state’s housing crisis by increasing supply and affordability.

These reforms, driven by bipartisan efforts and championed by Governor Greg Gianforte, tackled restrictive zoning and regulatory barriers that had constrained housing development, particularly during a population influx spurred by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Below is a detailed overview based on available information:

Background of the Housing Crisis

Pandemic-Driven Migration:

Montana saw significant in-migration during the pandemic as people sought rural, spacious areas. This led to soaring demand, with home prices nearly doubling from $266,473 in 2018 to $505,419 by 2023, while median household income rose only 28% to about $60,000.

Supply Constraints:

Strict zoning laws, such as single-family-only zoning and bans on duplexes or accessory dwelling units (ADUs), limited housing supply. In cities like Missoula, vacancy rates dropped below 1%, and regulations added up to 40% to the cost of new units.

Impact:

Teachers, nurses, and other essential workers struggled to afford housing, threatening community stability. Renters faced steep increases, with some areas seeing 37% rent hikes in two years.

Key Reforms of the Montana Miracle (2023)

In 2023, Montana’s legislature passed a package of bills, informed by a bipartisan Housing Task Force established by Gianforte in 2022, to deregulate housing development and boost supply.

Key Bills Included

Senate Bill 323: Legalized duplexes in single-family zones in larger municipalities, enabling more affordable “starter homes” for young families or retirees.

Senate Bill 528: Allowed ADUs (e.g., granny flats or garage apartments) statewide, increasing density without sprawling development.

Senate Bill 245: Permitted multifamily and mixed-use housing in commercial zones, maximizing land use in urban areas.

Senate Bill 382 (Land Use Planning Act): Overhauled zoning processes, requiring cities to plan for growth, adopt affordable housing strategies, and streamline permitting.

Other Measures:

Streamlined subdivision reviews (House Bill 211, Senate Bill 170), eliminated discretionary design reviews (Senate Bill 407), and invested $175 million in workforce housing and $105 million in infrastructure.

These reforms aimed to reduce regulatory barriers, encourage denser housing in cities, and preserve Montana’s rural character by avoiding sprawl. They gained broad support from a coalition of developers, environmentalists, and activists, framed as an “anti-California” approach to prevent restrictive zoning like that seen in high-cost coastal states.

Further Reforms in 2025

In 2025, Montana’s legislature continued its pro-housing agenda, passing additional bills to build on the 2023 reforms.

House Bill 492: Eliminated parking mandates for most new housing in larger cities (e.g., homes under 1,200 sq ft, affordable housing), potentially boosting construction by 40–70%.

Senate Bill 243: Allowed six-story apartment buildings in commercial and industrial zones, overriding local height restrictions.

Other Measures:

Limited developer impact fees, reduced condo defect liability, professionalized historic reviews, and legalized single-stair buildings up to six stories and rural ADUs.

These reforms, also bipartisan, focused on cutting costs and increasing flexibility for developers while maintaining community input.

Impact and Early Results

Positive Signs:

In Missoula, apartment vacancy rates rose from 1% to 6%, and rental rates dropped 20% within a year of the 2023 reforms. Bozeman saw similar trends.

Development Activity:

Cities like Whitefish and Bozeman began rewriting zoning codes, and Missoula approved housing for 162 families under new laws.

Long-Term Uncertainty:

Experts caution that affordability remains a challenge. While supply is increasing, it may take years to close the gap, with some doubting whether new housing will be affordable for low- and middle-income residents.

Challenges and Opposition

Legal Challenges:

In late 2023, Montanans Against Irresponsible Densification (MAID) sued to block the 2023 reforms, arguing they violated equal protection by allowing ADUs and duplexes only in areas without restrictive private covenants.

A preliminary injunction was granted in January 2024, halting implementation, but a March 2025 ruling upheld the reforms, allowing them to proceed.

Local Resistance:

Some homeowners feared denser housing would disrupt single-family neighborhoods, citing concerns about property values and community character.

Affordability Concerns:

Critics argue the reforms focus on supply but don’t directly address affordability, leaving some residents, like those in Bozeman paying half their income in rent, feeling no immediate relief.

Why It’s Called a “Miracle”

The term “Montana Miracle,” coined by journalist Kriston Capps, reflects the rarity of a conservative, Republican-led state passing progressive housing reforms, leapfrogging efforts in some liberal states.

The bipartisan coalition spanning developers, environmentalists, and libertarians overcame political divides, and the reforms’ comprehensive scope set a model for other states.

Critical Perspective

While the reforms are ambitious, the “miracle” label may be premature. Montana’s housing crisis stems from decades of under-building and recent migration pressures, and new supply alone may not ensure affordability for essential workers or low-income residents.

The focus on deregulation assumes market forces will lower prices, but without targeted subsidies or rent controls, some fear gentrification or luxury developments could dominate.

Additionally, legal and local push-back highlights ongoing tensions between growth and preservation. Checking back in five years, as suggested by experts, will reveal whether the reforms truly enable teachers, firefighters, and nurses to afford homes.

Montana’s Housing Miracle represents a bold, bipartisan effort to tackle a housing crisis through deregulation and increased supply.

The 2023 and 2025 reforms have begun to ease vacancy rates and rental costs in some cities, but affordability challenges persist, and the full impact will unfold over years.

The state’s model—leveraging a diverse coalition and task force offers lessons for others, though success hinges on sustained implementation and addressing affordability directly.




 

Happy Morse Code Day

Happy Morse Code Day

Morse Code Day is celebrated annually on April 27 to honor Samuel Morse, the inventor of Morse code, who was born on this day in 1791.

The day pays tribute to Morse’s pioneering contribution to communication technology, specifically the development of the electric telegraph and the concise, coded language that bears his name.

Samuel Morse, along with collaborators Alfred Vail and Joseph Henry, developed the Morse code system in 1836 as part of their work on the electric telegraph.

This code uses sequences of dots and dashes (or dits and dahs) to represent letters, numbers, and punctuation, enabling messages to be transmitted quickly over long distances.

The first official telegraph message, “What hath God wrought?”, was sent by Morse in 1844, marking a new era in telecommunications.

Morse code revolutionized global communication by allowing near-instantaneous transmission of information, which was a dramatic improvement over hand-delivered messages that could take weeks or months.

It played a crucial role in military operations, particularly during World War II, and was essential for maritime and aviation communications.

Even after the advent of radio and digital communication, Morse code has remained relevant, especially among amateur radio enthusiasts and in emergency signaling.

People mark this day in various creative and educational ways.

Many take the opportunity to learn the basics of this code, often starting with their own name or simple words using online resources, charts, and audio clips.

Enthusiasts send coded messages to friends or family, sometimes using light signals, tapping, or written dots and dashes.

Some incorporate the code into artwork, cakes, or crafts, using the code as a unique design element.

The amateur radio community often celebrates by making contacts using this code (CW), keeping the tradition alive.

This code is considered the world’s first digital code and has been in use for nearly 160 years.

The code was designed so that more frequently used letters have shorter representations (e.g., “E” is a single dot).

While largely phased out in official military and maritime use, the code is still taught and used in certain contexts, especially for secure or silent communication.

Related Observances

Celebrated on January 11, this day encourages people to learn how to spell their names using the code, highlighting its historical importance and practical applications.

Date Observance Honoree/Theme Activities
April 27 Morse Code Day Samuel Morse & Morse code Learning, sending messages, art, radio
January 11 Learn Your Name in Morse Code Day Morse code basics Spelling names, learning code

Today is both a celebration of technological innovation and an invitation to explore a fascinating, enduring method of communication that continues to inspire curiosity and creativity.

Other Notable Observances on April 27

While not directly related to this code, these holidays share the same date and are often mentioned alongside Morse Code Day.

National Tell A Story Day: Encourages storytelling and sharing narratives, highlighting the importance of communication, much like Morse code did in its era.

National Gummi Bear Day: A lighthearted celebration of the popular candy.

Babe Ruth Day: Honors the legendary baseball player.

National For Twelves Day: Celebrates the significance of the number twelve in various aspects of life.

Internaut Day: Focuses on internet navigation and digital literacy, another evolution in communication technology.




 

Montana reaches six months of unemployment below 3%

Montana reaches six months of unemployment below 3%

— by Micah Drew, Daily Montanan
April 22, 2025

With an unemployment rate of 2.7% in March, down from 2.8% last month, Montana has now seen six straight months of rates under 3%.

The governor’s office and Department of Labor and Industry continue to praise the low seasonally adjusted unemployment rate, the third stint below 3% since the Federal Reserve began measuring the rate in the 1970s.

Coming out of the COVID-19 pandemic, Montana saw an unemployment rate below 3% for two full years from October 2021 to October 2023.

It ticked up slightly from then to 3.1% in December of that year, before slowly ticking down. March marked the 45th consecutive month of unemployment at or below 3.4%.

“For six months, Montana’s unemployment rate has remained below 3%, with nearly two job openings for every unemployed worker,” Gov. Greg Gianforte said in a press release. “Through our efforts to lower taxes and remove red tape, we’ve have created an environment that empowers entrepreneurs and businesses to invest and create good-paying jobs for Montanans across our state.”

The unemployment was 1.5% lower than the national rate, which came in at 4.2% in March. The state’s unadjusted unemployment rate of 3.0% ranks 5th in the U.S. 

The state said the labor force in Montana decreased by 572 workers last month. Data shows the state has added 1,500 payroll jobs over the last month.

Forty-four of the state’s counties currently have unemployment rates below 4%, and 19 of them have seen net job gains over the last year year, according to data from the Department of Labor and Industry.

Gallatin County has seen the largest drop in employment over the last year with 348 fewer people employed this year compared to last. Missoula county, however, has seen the most growth with 860 additional people becoming employed.

Unemployment rates remain higher on the state’s seven Native American reservations – ranging from a non-seasonally adjusted rate of 4.7% on the Flathead Indian Reservation up to 13.1% on Rocky Boy’s reservation. All seven reservations have seen net job decreases in the last year.

sourced —

Daily Montanan is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Daily Montanan maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Darrell Ehrlick for questions: info@dailymontanan.com.




 

Abundant Information, Rare Wisdom: Filtering in the Digital Age

Abundant Information, Rare Wisdom
Where Information is Abundant and Wisdom is Rare: The Art of Filtering in the Digital Age

Every second, the world creates 1.7 MB of data for every person on earth. By the time you finish reading this introduction, over 8 million emails will have been sent, 571 new websites created, and 69,444 Google searches performed. Your brain — a marvel of evolution designed for a world of information scarcity — now faces a tsunami of data every waking moment. We are drowning in information while thirsting for wisdom.

This paradox defines our era: unprecedented access to knowledge, yet a growing scarcity of wisdom—the discernment to know what matters, what’s true, and what deserves our precious attention. The widening chasm between information and wisdom isn’t merely academic; it manifests in our collective anxiety, increasingly polarized discourse, and the peculiar modern condition of knowing more while understanding less.

The solution isn’t more information, but better filtration — sophisticated mental frameworks that help us determine what to seek, what to avoid, and what to simply ignore. As we’ll explore, mastering this art of filtering may be the most crucial skill for navigating the 21st century information landscape.

The Great Paradox: Unlimited Information, Limited Wisdom

The democratization of knowledge through digital technologies represents humanity’s most extraordinary achievement and its most perplexing challenge. Anyone with an internet connection now accesses more information daily than our ancestors could in their entire lifetimes.

Yet our cognitive architecture — magnificent as it is — evolved for information scarcity, not abundance. The human brain can hold only about seven items in working memory simultaneously. When bombarded with constant information flows, our cognitive systems become overwhelmed, triggering decision fatigue, shallow thinking, and impaired judgment — precisely the opposite of wisdom.

True wisdom transcends mere information possession. It requires understanding context, grasping implications, recognizing limitations, and integrating knowledge with lived experience. These processes demand reflection and deep thought — precisely the cognitive resources increasingly scarce in our hyperconnected reality. Information travels at light speed; wisdom moves at the pace of human reflection.

The Filtering Triad: A Framework for Information Wisdom

At the heart of transforming information into wisdom lies the art of filtering — but not all filtering is created equal. We need a sophisticated framework that addresses three distinct filtering challenges:

The Inclusion Filter: Seeking the Valuable

“What information truly deserves my attention and integration?”

The inclusion filter operates from an abundance mindset, proactively seeking information that aligns with our values, goals, and growth. Rather than passively consuming algorithmic feeds, inclusion filtering requires deliberate curation.

Consider Warren Buffett, who famously reads 500 pages daily but is highly selective about what enters his information diet. His inclusion filter prioritizes annual reports, business histories, and industry analyses that support his investment decisions while ignoring market noise and short-term fluctuations.

Practical inclusion filtering might mean cultivating relationships with trusted curators, following specific experts rather than trending topics, or creating systems that prioritize depth over breadth. The guiding principle shifts from “Is this interesting?” to “Is this valuable?” — a distinction that matters enormously when the interesting will always out-compete the important for our attention if left unmanaged.

The Exclusion Filter: Rejecting the Harmful

“What information should I protect myself from?”

In a world rife with misinformation, manipulation, and content designed to hijack our emotional responses, developing a robust exclusion filter is essential. This requires critical thinking skills like source evaluation, fact-checking, and recognizing logical fallacies.

Nobel laureate Daniel Kahneman exemplifies this approach through “adversarial collaboration” — deliberately seeking out those who disagree with him to test his ideas. His exclusion filter doesn’t avoid challenging perspectives but rejects intellectual dishonesty and motivated reasoning.

Exclusion filtering isn’t about creating an echo chamber — quite the opposite. It’s about developing the discernment to recognize genuinely harmful content that degrades rather than enhances understanding. The person with a weak exclusion filter becomes vulnerable to manipulation; the person with an overly aggressive one risks intellectual isolation.

The Noise Filter: Managing the Neutral

“Is this worth my limited attention right now?”

Perhaps most challenging is filtering the vast middle ground — content that’s neither particularly harmful nor valuable but consumes cognitive bandwidth nonetheless. This includes endless social media updates, breaking news with little relevance to our lives, trivial controversies, and content designed primarily to keep us scrolling rather than thinking.

Consider how writer and mathematician Nassim Taleb approaches information: he deliberately avoids daily news in favor of reading books that have stood the test of time, recognizing that most current events are simply noise that will seem irrelevant within weeks.

Noise filtering involves setting boundaries around information consumption, creating information rituals rather than permitting constant intake, and developing the meta-cognitive awareness to recognize when we’re consuming out of habit rather than intention.

When Filtering Systems Fail: The Consequences

Our collective struggle with wisdom often stems from specific filtering failures, each with distinct consequences:

When inclusion filters fail, we miss crucial information that could enhance our understanding. This manifests as ignorance of important developments in our field, blindness to perspectives that could challenge and improve our thinking, or simply never encountering transformative ideas.

The scientist who reads only within their narrow specialty misses cross-disciplinary insights that could revolutionize their research. The business leader who consumes only industry news overlooks societal trends that will disrupt their market. Their inclusion filters have become too restrictive, creating blind spots.

Exclusion filter failures leave us vulnerable to misinformation and manipulation. We see this in the spread of conspiracy theories, the effectiveness of propaganda, and the general decline in epistemic standards across public discourse. Without robust mechanisms to identify and reject false information, we build understanding on foundations of sand.

Consider how easily deepfakes and AI-generated content now spread when our exclusion filters haven’t evolved to detect these sophisticated forms of manipulation. The average person encounters dozens of misleading claims daily but lacks the tools to effectively evaluate them.

Most pervasive today is noise filter failure — the constant state of overwhelm and distraction characterizing modern information consumption. When everything seems equally important, nothing is. The consequence is a peculiar form of knowing-yet-not-knowing — encountering vast information but lacking the cognitive space to process it meaningfully.

This explains why many professionals read dozens of articles about productivity yet struggle to implement basic time management practices. The information was acquired but never transformed into understanding because the cognitive environment was too cluttered with noise.

These filtering failures don’t just affect individuals; they scale to societal problems. Political polarization stems partly from inclusion filter failure — we curate environments that reinforce rather than challenge our views. The erosion of shared reality reflects exclusion filter weakness — we lack common standards for determining what’s true. And our collective difficulty addressing long-term challenges like climate change reflects noise filter breakdown — urgent matters get lost in the daily deluge.

The Evolution of Personal Filters: From Novice to Master

Developing effective filtering systems is a lifelong journey with distinct developmental stages:

The novice filter operates reactively and inconsistently. Information consumption is driven primarily by what’s immediately appealing, trending, or algorithmically presented. There’s little meta-cognitive awareness about information quality or relevance. Most of us begin here, especially in unfamiliar domains.

With intentional practice, intermediate filtering emerges. This involves creating systematic approaches with clear criteria — perhaps curated news sources, trusted experts to follow, or scheduled information consumption. While more effective, intermediate filtering can be rigid and lacks contextual sensitivity.

Advanced filtering introduces adaptability — recognizing that different domains require different filtering approaches. What works for professional knowledge may not work for civic understanding or personal growth. Advanced filters are principles-based rather than rule-based, allowing flexibility while maintaining discernment.

True mastery appears when filtering becomes largely intuitive. The master filter no longer consciously analyzes each piece of information using explicit criteria; instead, years of practice have developed an almost instinctual sense of what deserves attention. This represents the integration of all three filtering dimensions—inclusion, exclusion, and noise management — working in harmony.

Consider how a seasoned journalist can immediately spot a credible source, or how an experienced investor can quickly identify significant market signals amid daily fluctuations. Their filtering wisdom has become embodied knowledge rather than conscious effort.

This progression highlights an important truth: filtering wisdom doesn’t emerge overnight. It requires deliberate practice, reflection, and the humility to recognize when our current systems aren’t serving us well.

Building Your Filtering System: Practical Wisdom for the Information Age

Developing wisdom in the information age requires practical implementation. Here are concrete approaches to strengthen each filtering dimension:

Cultivating Better Inclusion Filters

Start by clarifying your information priorities. What domains genuinely matter for your growth, work, relationships, and contribution? Create systems that prioritize depth in these areas rather than breadth across everything.

Implement “information fasts” — periods where you deliberately narrow your intake to deepen understanding. This might mean spending a month with three books on a single topic rather than skimming headlines across dozens of subjects.

Seek out “perennial information” — knowledge that remains valuable regardless of when it was created. While some domains require currency, many of the most important ideas are timeless. The signal-to-noise ratio in content created years or decades ago is often much higher than in the latest updates.

Strengthening Exclusion Filters

Develop the habit of source evaluation before consumption. Consider factors like expertise, transparency about methods, potential conflicts of interest, and track record. This doesn’t mean rejecting information solely based on source, but adjusting your confidence accordingly.

Practice “delayed judgment” — when encountering information that triggers strong emotional responses, institute a waiting period before accepting or sharing it. Our critical faculties are weakest when emotions run high.

Learn the basic patterns of manipulation and misinformation. Understanding techniques like false equivalence, cherry-picking data, or emotional manipulation creates cognitive antibodies against these approaches.

Mastering Noise Management

Implement technological boundaries — notification settings, app blockers, and digital minimalism—that create space for focused attention. The default settings of most digital tools optimize for engagement, not wisdom.

Develop personal heuristics for relevance. Questions like “Will this matter in a week? A month? A year?” help distinguish between the merely new and the genuinely important.

Create information rituals rather than allowing constant consumption. Designated times for news, social media, or general browsing prevent information from infiltrating every moment of cognitive space.

Practice single-tasking instead of multitasking, especially with information. Deep understanding requires focused attention, not divided consciousness.

The Wisdom Paradox: Beyond Filtering

The ultimate goal isn’t to become better at filtering information — it’s to develop the wisdom that makes filtering less necessary. This is the filtering paradox: as your wisdom grows, the conscious effort required for filtering diminishes.

We see this in experts across domains. The chess grand-master doesn’t evaluate every possible move; years of experience have developed an intuitive sense of which moves deserve consideration. The master physician doesn’t consciously work through every potential diagnosis; they recognize patterns that immediately narrow possibilities. The wise elder doesn’t need to analyze every situation using explicit ethical frameworks; their integrated understanding guides judgment naturally.

This represents a shift from information management to meaning-making. Rather than sorting through endless data points, the wise mind gravitates naturally toward what matters, recognizing patterns and implications that remain invisible to others.

The Future of Filtering: Collective Wisdom in the Digital Age

While personal filtering systems are essential, we also need collective approaches to information wisdom. Our greatest challenges — from climate change to technological governance to social cohesion — require shared understanding across different perspectives.

This means developing better collective filtering mechanisms: education systems that teach discernment rather than just knowledge acquisition; technological platforms designed for understanding rather than engagement; cultural norms that value reflection over reaction; and institutions that bridge rather than exploit our filtering differences.

The most promising opportunity may lie in the partnership between human and artificial intelligence. AI systems excel at processing vast information quantities but lack contextual understanding and value judgment. Humans possess wisdom but limited processing capacity. The right partnership could amplify our collective filtering wisdom rather than undermining it.

Imagine AI systems that help identify your information blind-spots, detect your cognitive biases in real-time, or create personalized learning pathways that gradually build wisdom rather than just knowledge. These tools wouldn’t replace human judgment but would extend and enhance our natural filtering capabilities.

Conclusion: The Path From Information to Transformation

In a world where information is abundant and wisdom is rare, the gap between them isn’t filled by acquiring more information but by developing better filtering systems — knowing what to seek, what to avoid, and what to simply let pass by.

This isn’t just an intellectual exercise; it’s a pathway to transformation. When we move from drowning in information to discerning what truly matters, we create the cognitive space for deeper understanding, more meaningful connections, and wiser decisions.

The paradox of our age contains its own resolution: the very abundance that threatens to overwhelm us also offers unprecedented opportunities for growth — if we can develop the filtering wisdom to navigate it. In this sense, the information age doesn’t diminish the possibility of wisdom; it makes wisdom more essential and valuable than ever before.

As you navigate today’s information landscape, remember: the quality of your life will increasingly depend not on what you know, but on how wisely you filter. In a world of infinite information, the truly scarce resource is the wisdom to know what matters.




 

- Advertisement -