Home Blog

Major Flooding in Lincoln County

Major Flooding in Lincoln County

Lincoln County is currently experiencing severe flooding due to an atmospheric river weather event bringing heavy rain and warm temperatures, leading to rapid snow-melt and swollen waterways.

This is part of a broader catastrophic flooding episode across the Pacific Northwest, with Lincoln County among the hardest-hit areas in Montana.

Lincoln County Advisories

The Lincoln County Sheriff’s Office has issued an urgent advisory for necessary travel only across the entire county due to widespread flooding, rockslides, and mudslides. Residents are urged to avoid non-essential movement to prevent accidents and allow emergency crews to operate.

Multiple highways and roads are impassable. Key closures include:

    • U.S. Highway 2 between Libby and Kalispell.
    • State Highway 56 between Libby and Noxon.
    • State Route 482 (S-482) from mile marker 0 to 6.5 south of Libby.
    • Several bridges have been damaged or washed out, exacerbating isolation in rural areas.

Montana Disaster and Emergency Services is monitoring these and warning of increased risks.

School and Public Service Disruptions

Schools in Lincoln County have been canceled or closed due to the weather. A precautionary boil water order is in effect for Libby residents due to high turbidity potentially contaminating the water supply. Water system personnel are actively addressing the issue.

Specific Flood Reports:

Local observations include:

    • About 6 inches of water over West 2nd Street in Libby near Parmenter Creek.
    • Up to a foot of water flooding residences along Vicks Lane southeast of Libby from Libby Creek overflow.

A Flood Watch remains in effect for Lincoln County and surrounding areas (including Flathead, Lake, Sanders, and Mineral Counties) through at least the rest of today with expectations of continued ponding on roadways, urban flooding, and potential for additional slides.

The National Weather Service has noted this as a major event, with some rivers like the Skagit River in Western Washington state approaching or exceeding flood stages.

Recommendations

    • Follow updates from the Lincoln County Sheriff’s Office, Montana Highway Patrol, and local news outlets.
    • Avoid flooded roads and low-lying areas; “turn around, don’t drown.”
    • For emergencies, contact local authorities or dial 911.
    • Monitor real-time conditions via official sources like the Montana Department of Transportation or NOAA.

This situation is evolving, with reports indicating ongoing risks. Historical context shows Lincoln County has faced significant flooding in past years (e.g., 2022 and 2023 events), but the current event is described as particularly severe.

If you’re in the area, prioritize safety and heed evacuation warnings if issued.




22 Measles cases now confirmed in Gallatin County

22 Measles cases now confirmed in Gallatin County

Two new measles cases have been discovered in Gallatin County thus bringing the County’s total up to 22 confirmed measles infections since the start of the outbreak earlier in the year, with 13 among children (ages 17 and under) and 9 among adults.

The infected individuals may have exposed others at over 20 public locations across Gallatin County (including Bozeman and Belgrade) and three sites in Missoula County during November 2025, such as stores, restaurants, airports, medical facilities, and churches.

No confirmed cases have been reported in Missoula County as of the latest updates, though health officials there issued exposure warnings for an infected visitor on November 22, 2025.

There hasn’t been any additional confirmed measles cases reported statewide since December 1st, based on available health department and news sources.

Health authorities across the state are recommending checking your MMR vaccination status, as two doses provide 97% protection.

If you’re not immune and have been exposed, you should contact your local health department; symptoms like fever, cough, runny nose, red eyes, and rash typically appear within 7-14 days after exposure.

For the full list of exposure sites and times, you can visit the Gallatin City-County Health Department website (or your local City-County Health Department).

sourced — dphhs.mt.gov




College Campus Bias: Tips for Surviving University Life

Tips for Surviving University Life

You just graduated High School and now you’re headed for University — congratulations — you made it. Sure, you’ve looked at the news, and what with all that’s supposedly going on in the academic world these days, you might be wondering about just how you might be able cope with all of the distraction, noise and nonsense.

If you’re a conservative kid, hitting our modern left-leaning Universities can appear to be somewhat of a daunting task. Not to worry though because nothing is as it seems. Education isn’t as static as most might have you believe. You might be surprised to learn that campus life can be a total delight even in spite of what the nightly news tells you.

Here’s bit of advice for kids that are trying to navigate the busy world of University life.

If you’re a student with differing views (e.g., conservative) facing ideologically left-leaning instructors (or vice versa), you would do well to focus on academic excellence and strategic engagement rather than confrontation.

Tips for Surviving University Life

Prioritize strong academic performance:

Deliver high-quality work on time to demonstrate respect and capability, making it harder for bias to affect grades. This builds credibility and can even win over your instructors.

Engage respectfully and use evidence:

In discussions, present your views with solid facts, logic, and a positive attitude. Incorporate humor to diffuse tension, and frame arguments as truth-seeking rather than combative. Avoid emotional outbursts — aim to persuade through debate.

Choose courses and majors strategically:

If possible, avoid classes with known radical biases by researching instructors (e.g., via RateMyProfessors or syllabi). Opt for fields like economics, business, or STEM where conservative perspectives are more tolerated or ideas are evaluated objectively.

Don’t isolate yourself:

Interact with diverse peers and faculty to broaden your understanding — exposure to opposing views can strengthen your own. Join conservative student groups for support, but avoid echo chambers.

Document potential bias and know your rights:

If you suspect unfair grading or hostility, keep records of assignments and feedback. Use university policies on free speech or appeal processes if needed, but only as a last resort — most issues resolve through dialogue.

Stay open to learning:

Some instructors note that “liberal” exposure comes more from peers than faculty. Use the experience to refine your beliefs without compromising them.

Overall, campuses lean left, with surveys showing faculty Democrats outnumbering Republicans significantly, but survival comes from skill, not ideology clashes.

Many of us already know that even a thin pancake has two sides. It’s a fact of life that there are always going to be two sides to any story and whether you like it or not, you’re very likely on one side or the other.

In my own experience (1979), college was somewhat quirky but manageable. I’ve often found myself saying that things have changed over the years — things were different back in the day — but were they? Really?

People haven’t really changed that much at all:

If I looked back hard enough, I could probably see various forms of bias — even clear back when.

The biases of today aren’t really that different from the biases of yesteryear except that today, these biases are broadcast every night on the national news whereas biases from the 70’s weren’t. Though they be the same, biases weren’t the thing then like they are now.

These days, and in light of just how far off the rails we’ve gone, academic bias often manifests itself in political contexts, particularly in higher education where surveys show faculty lean left, with liberals outnumbering conservatives significantly (e.g., 72% of faculty identifying as liberal). It might be important to note that you’re going to school to become an engineer, not a politician, so all of the ideological B.S. on campus doesn’t really concern you.

Here are some specific examples (of bias) drawn from studies, surveys, and anecdotes, that focus on mostly the political biases we find today in our institutions of higher learning.
(Note: While liberal bias against conservatives is more commonly reported in research, there are counter-examples of discrimination against left-leaning views as well.)

Bias Against Conservatives

Hiring and Promotion Discrimination:

In social sciences and humanities, 15% of political scientists and 24% of philosophy instructors admitted they would discriminate against Republican job applicants. Additionally, 4 in 10 American academics would not hire a known Trump supporter, and 1 in 3 British academics would discriminate against a Brexit supporter.

Self-Censorship and Hostile Environment:

70% of conservative academics in U.S. social sciences/humanities self-censor, with 75% reporting a hostile departmental environment for their beliefs. Over 90% of Trump-supporting academics wouldn’t share views with colleagues, and 85% of Democratic colleagues agree they should stay silent. Only 20% of faculty believe a conservative would fit well in their department.

Discipline and Threats:

1 in 3 conservative graduate students or academics in the U.S. has been disciplined or threatened for their views.

Grant and Research Evaluation:

Between 20% and 50% of academics would mark a right-leaning grant application lower.

Anecdotal Hostility:

At one university, faculty assumed anyone voting for George W. Bush was “evil or stupid.” During a talk by conservative speaker Dinesh D’Souza, he faced belligerent questions and hostility, akin to an evolutionary biologist at a religious college. In another case, a faculty meeting voice vote on an anti-Iraq war resolution passed overwhelmingly, pressuring dissenters.

Bias Against Liberals

In current research the examples below are less prevalent, as academia skews liberal overall, but some studies highlight reverse discrimination.

Discrimination by Conservative Faculty:

Conservative and centrist faculty discriminate against leftists more than liberals do against conservatives, per a study on ideological bias.

Political Litmus Tests:

74% of liberal faculty support mandatory diversity statements in hiring, which 90% of conservative faculty view as political tests that could disadvantage liberals in conservative-leaning departments or institutions.

Historical and Isolated Cases:

During the McCarthy era (1950s), liberal professors were targeted for suspected communist sympathies, leading to firings and blacklisting. More recently, in conservative-dominated fields like business or at religious universities, liberal views on issues like LGBTQ+ rights have led to tenure denials or backlash, though specific modern cases are anecdotal and less documented in broad surveys.

Other Forms of Political Bias

Peer Review and Publishing:

Liberal academics admit to discriminating against conservatives in peer review processes.

Classroom Indoctrination Perceptions:

Conservative students report biased grading or discussions, but research shows ideology has minimal impact on grades. Conversely, accusations of “social justice indoctrination” target liberal professors.

Some of these examples stem from surveys and studies, with bias often self-reported or perceptual. While liberal dominance is well-documented (e.g., Democrats outnumber Republicans 7:1 in social sciences), actual discrimination varies widely by institution and field.

Anecdotal

One day we were in Missoula during Homecoming and we had to wait for the same light to change 3 times on Higgins for all of the kids in the street. I told my son that the kids in college that party all the time are the same kids that will either drop out or will graduate at the bottom of their class. The kids you don’t see out partying every Friday night are the kids that will graduate higher in their class and have a better chance of making a difference because they’re in studying.

I also told my son to stay the course and not to worry about what everybody else is doing — stay focused and be deliberate in the pursuit of your chosen field of study. College by itself is a pretty big deal for most kids so don’t blow it by getting sidetracked by personal opinions and various other failed ideologies.

There are those in this world that seem to think you might be ruined by University, but don’t worry, kids come out of it every day and are none-the-worse for the wear — with degree in hand they know what they can do and who they are — they’re ready to face the world head on.

Our son’s in college now and based on how he’s getting on, I’m sure he’ll be just fine.

sourced — manhattan.instituteaei.orghechingerreport.org




Department of the Interior: National Parks non-resident price hikes

Department of the Interior

The US Department of the Interior recently announced fee increases for non-US residents (including foreign tourists) at 11 popular national parks, effective January 1, 2026. This policy, described as America-first pricing, aims to prioritize affordability for American families while requiring international visitors to contribute more toward park maintenance and improvements. US citizens and permanent residents are unaffected and will continue paying standard fees, such as $80 for an annual America the Beautiful pass.

New Fees Schedule

Per-Person Fee for Non-Residents

International visitors without an annual pass will pay an additional $100 per person (on top of the standard vehicle or individual entrance fee) to enter the affected parks. This applies per entry and is in addition to existing fees (e.g., a typical $35 per vehicle entrance fee at many parks).

Annual Pass for Non-Residents

The price for a non-resident annual pass will rise to $250 per vehicle (up from $80), granting access to all national parks for a year. US residents remain eligible for the $80 pass.

Fee-Free Days

Eight fee-free days in 2026 (e.g., Memorial Day, Independence Day, Veterans Day) will be exclusive to US residents; non-residents will still pay full fees on those days.

Other Updates

The changes coincide with a modernized online reservation system and improved access for motorcyclists.

Affected National Parks

The fee hikes apply to the following 11 highly visited parks:

    • Acadia National Park — Maine
    • Bryce Canyon National Park — Utah
    • Everglades National Park — Florida
    • Glacier National Park — Montana
    • Grand Canyon National Park — Arizona
    • Grand Teton National Park — Wyoming
    • Rocky Mountain National Park — Colorado
    • Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks — California
    • Yellowstone National Park — Wyoming/Montana/Idaho
    • Yosemite National Park — California
    • Zion National Park — Utah

Reasons and Context

The new pricing policy stems from an executive order signed by President Trump in July 2025, directing the Interior Department to increase fees for overseas visitors. Secretary Doug Burgum stated that since US taxpayers fund the national park system, international visitors should pay a fairer share for upkeep, especially amid planned budget reductions for the National Park Service. Revenue from the hikes will support conservation efforts.

Reactions and Concerns

The announcement about the National Parks admissions price hike with regard to non-residents has sparked mixed responses. Tourism industry groups and some experts express apprehension that the steep increases could deter international visitors, who make up a significant portion of park attendance (e.g., about 20% at Rocky Mountain National Park). This might harm local economies reliant on tourism, such as gateway communities near parks like Yellowstone and the Grand Canyon. Environmental organizations like the Sierra Club have criticized the move as part of broader fee hikes that could limit access to public lands. However, supporters argue it ensures fairness and sustainability for the parks. So far, no widespread boycotts or legal challenges have been reported.




The Jetsons: Video calls were everyday life

The Jetsons

In The Jetsons, video calls were treated as an ordinary, ubiquitous part of daily life long before that was true in the real world, and this has become one of the show’s most famous future predictions.

Characters in the show constantly use wall-mounted or desk videophones at home and at work, especially George Jetson’s calls with his boss, Mr. Spacely, which are shown as routine business communication rather than special events.

Family and friends also drop in via video at all hours, which creates comic situations such as Jane Jetson throwing on a morning mask to look presentable for an unexpected early call from her friend.

When The Jetsons premiered in 1962, real videophones like AT&T’s experimental Picturephone existed only as expensive demos or limited trials, not as common household devices.

The series assumed that technical hurdles and cost would be solved, presenting videophones as simple appliances as familiar as TVs or radios, reflecting mid‑century optimism about technology reshaping everyday domestic life.

Today we’ve gone from Sci‑Fi gag to everyday reality — with mainstream tools such as Skype, Zoom, and FaceTime making real‑time video communication on phones, tablets, and computers a normal part of work, school, and social life, closely mirroring the casual, frequent calling seen in the cartoon.

Wrist‑mounted video devices like George Jetson’s video watch now resemble modern smartwatches, which can place video calls or integrate with phones, further reinforcing how closely contemporary habits track the show’s imagined future.